本文已被：浏览 5405次 下载 0次
中文摘要: 目的 调查分析社区医护人员对经外周静脉置中心静脉导管（PICC）健康教育知信行情况。方法 选择本市2个三甲医院医护人员120人（三甲组）与5个社区医院医护人员120人（社区组）进行比较研究，纳入时间2015年1月-2017年1月，对两组医护人员PICC健康教育知信行情况进行调查，比较两组医护人员PICC健康教育知信行各个维度与总分，以及健康知识知晓情况。结果 三甲组医护人员在PICC健康教育行为评分、知识评分、信念评分上与社区组比较无明显差异（P>0.05），但总分明显高于社区组（P<0.05）；三甲组医护人员在PICC基本知识、预防知识、带管注意事项、应急处理知识知晓率上均显著高于社区组（P<0.05）；社区组行为知晓条目的平均分和标准得分略高于社区组。结论 社区医护人员PICC健康教育知信行调查结果表明存在不足之处，维度评分与总分不高，而且在PICC基本知识、预防知识、带管注意事项、应急处理知识知晓率上较低，需加大培训与宣教力度。
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To investigate and analyze community health care workers' knowledge of health education through central venous catheter (PICC). METHODS A total of 120 medical staff (three teams) from two top three hospitals in the city and 120 community health workers (community groups) from five community hospitals were selected to conduct a comparative study. From January 2015 to January 2017, (PICC), health education knowledge (PICC), health education information (PICC), health care status and health status of PICC, Knowledge, precautions with pipe, emergency response knowledge). RESULTS There was no significant difference (P> 0.05) in PICC health education behavior score, knowledge score and belief score among community health care group, but the total score was significantly higher than that of community group (P <0.05) The knowledge of PICC, precautionary knowledge, precautions of taking care of tube, knowledge of emergency treatment knowledge were significantly higher than that of community group (P <0.05). CONCLUSION The survey results of PICC health education in community health care workers show that there are some shortcomings, the dimension score and the total score are not high, and the knowledge of PICC, precautionary knowledge, precautions for taking care of pipe, awareness of emergency treatment knowledge is low, Increase training and education efforts.
keywords: community health workers PICC health education KABP
文章编号：3201809013 中图分类号：R1-9 文献标志码：
基金项目:
| 作者 | 单位 |
| 戴梅华①，曹 青①# |
| Author Name | Affiliation |
引用文本：