###
中国初级卫生保健:2018,32(10):69-71
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
中西医结合治疗病毒感染后嗅觉障碍的疗效观察
摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献
本文已被:浏览 6145次   下载 0
    
中文摘要: 目的 观察针刺+嗅觉训练+药物治疗的中西医结合方法治疗病毒感染后嗅觉障碍(PVOD)患者的临床疗效。 方法 回顾性分析我院2011年1月至2016年12月随访成功的62例PVOD患者,分为对照组和实验组,对照组运用嗅觉训练+药物治疗,实验组运用针刺+嗅觉训练+药物治疗的中西医结合方法治疗。在治疗前及治疗后1~3个月行T&T嗅觉测试,将治疗前后嗅觉功能测试结果进行比较分析。 结果 两组治疗1个月与治疗前比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗2个月(P<0.05)和3个月(P<0.01)与治疗前相比差异具有统计学意义;两组治疗后,对照组有效率为41.38%,实验组有效率为66.67%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组嗅觉减退与嗅觉丧失的治疗有效率为31.03%和10.35%(P<0.05),实验组为42.42%和24.24%(P<0.05)。结论 针刺+嗅觉训练+药物治疗的中西医结合方法治疗PVOD有相对较好的疗效;治疗时间的延长有助于嗅觉功能的恢复;嗅觉减退的治疗效果好于嗅觉丧失。
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To observe the clinical effect of acupuncture + olfactory training + drug therapy combined with traditional Chinese and Western Medicine on post-viral olfactory dysfunction. METHODS A retrospective analysis of our hospital from January 2011 to December 2016 the successful follow-up of 62 cases of PVOD patients, divided into two groups, the control group using olfactory training + drug treatment, the experimental group using the acupuncture + olfactory training + drug treatment of Integrated Chinese and Western medicine treatment, before treatment and after 1 to 3 months for T&T olfactory test, will before and after the treatment of olfactory function test results for statistical analysis.RESULTS The control group and the experimental group for 1 months before and after treatment were no significant difference(P>0.05), 2 months of treatment(P<0.05) and 3 months (P<0.01) compared with before treatment, the difference was statistically significant; treatment efficiency of the two groups: the control group was 41.38%, experiment group 66.67% (P﹤0.05); hyposmia and treatment of anosmia: effective rate of control group was 31.03% and 10.35% (P < 0.05), the experimental group was 42.42% and 24.24% (P﹤0.05). CONCLUSIONS Acupuncture plus olfactory training plus drug therapy has a relatively good effect in the treatment of PVOD; The prolongation of treatment time is helpful for the recovery of olfactory function; The effect of olfactory reduction is better than that of olfactory loss.
文章编号:3201810026     中图分类号:R765.6+3    文献标志码:
基金项目:
Author NameAffiliation
  
引用文本:


用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫