本文已被:浏览 4883次 下载 0次
中文摘要: 目的 对社区卫生服务机构目前开展的安宁疗护服务项目进行合理性评价,为安宁疗护服务优化提供建议。方法
于2018年1—11月,以上海市静安区静安寺街道社区卫生服务中心为研究对象,通过小组会议、机构调研和专家咨询等多种
方式,借助 4个强制性原则评价安宁疗护服务项目是否可进行合理性计分,借助 5个非强制性原则进行合理性分值计算。结 果 满足4个强制性原则的安宁疗护服务项目有142项,不满足的有118项。142项合理性分值测算的结果显示,合理性评分小
于1的有37项,其他评分均为1。结论 需方需要且符合安宁疗护理念是安宁疗护服务范围拓展的前提;有无临床指南支持及
需方因素成为影响安宁疗护服务合理性的关键。
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To analyze the rationality of the hospice care services currently carried out by community health
center, so that to provide suggestions for the optimization of institutional hospice care services. METHODS During the pe⁃
riod from January to November 2018, the Jing’an Temple Street Community Health Center in Jing’an District of Shang⁃
hai was chosen as the research object, whose hospice care services’rationality were analyzed with the method of Group
meetings, institutional research, expert consultation, etc. in which hospice care services were assessed with 4 mandatory
principles to first, and services meeting 4 mandatory principles were carried on the rationality calculation with 5
non-mandatory principles. RESULTS 142 items of hospice care service met 4 mandatory principles, and 118 items did
not meet the mandatory principle. The results of 142 items’rationality calculation showed that, there were 37 items with
a reasonableness score of less than 1, and all other scores were 1. CONCLUSION The needs of the demand side and in
line with the hospice concept were the premise for the expansion of the scope of hospice care services; the availability of
clinical guidelines and the demand factor had become the key to affecting the rationality of hospice care services
keywords: hospice care service rationality
文章编号:3202005009 中图分类号:R48 文献标志码:
基金项目:
| Author Name | Affiliation |
引用文本:
