###
中国初级卫生保健:2026,40(7):106-108
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
甘肃省疾控机构食源性疾病事件现场应急处置人员 专业知识测试结果及影响因素分析
摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献
本文已被:浏览 6309次   下载 0
    
中文摘要: 摘 要 :目的:了解甘肃省疾病预防控制机构食源性疾病事件现场应急处置人员专业知识掌握情况及其影响因素,为 改进培训方式及内容提供依据。方法:以闭卷形式对参加2022—2023年甘肃省食源性疾病现场流行病学培训的人员在培训 前进行测试,用多因素分析方法对得分影响因素进行分析。结果:共148名人员完成测试,按满分20分计算,平均得分为 (11.5±2.9 ) 分 ,总体知识正确率仅为46.4%,在确认暴发需要了解的信息、 有关启动调查的陈述、病例定义制定、流行曲 线的信息识别及专项措施选择等5个问题上得分较低。多因素分析结果显示,测试得分与年龄、职称及岗位工作年限等因素 无关( P>0.05) 与学历有关( t=2.943,P<0.05) 。 结论:甘肃省疾病预防控制中心应急处置人员对专业知识掌握存在明 显不足,尤其对细节知识方面较为欠缺,需通过加强继续教育提高人员专业素质,同时还应调整传统培训模式,以提高有 限培训资源的利用效率
Abstract:Abstract: OBJECTIVE To assess the level of professional knowledge mastery among on-site emergency response personnel for foodborne disease outbreaks in CDC institutions of Gansu Province and to identify influencing factors,thereby providing a basis for further improving training methods and content. METHODS A closed-book test was administered to participants before their attendance at the provincial training program on on-site epidemiology of foodborne diseases from in 2022 to 2023.Multifactorial analysis was used to analyze the factors influencing test scores. RESULTS A total of 148 relevant personnel completed the test.Based on a full score of 20 points,the average score was(11.5±2.9)points,and the overall knowledge accuracy rate was only 46.4%.Low scores were observed in 5 areas:information needed to confirm an outbreak,statements related to initiating an investigation,case definition formulation, identification of information on epidemic curves,and selection of specific measures.Multifactorial analysis results showed that test scores were not significantly associated with age,professional title,or years of work experience(P>0.05).However,there were associated with educational level(t=2.943,P<0.05). CONCLUSION Emergency responders from Gansu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention significant deficiencies in knowledge mastery,particularly in detailed knowledge.Continuing education is needed to improve professional competence.At the same time,traditional training models should be adjusted to achieve greater returns from limited training funds.
文章编号:3202410024     中图分类号:R155.3    文献标志码:
基金项目:
作者单位
王 玉 明  
Author NameAffiliation
  
引用文本:


用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫